401(k) Plan Fiduciaries – Have you thought about your continued offering of the PIMCO Total Return Fund?

Tom Hoecker • September 30, 2014

The abrupt departure of Bill Gross from PIMCO leaves many investors pondering their next move.  Should an investor stay the course and see how PIMCO’s new investment team performs?  Should an investor leave and follow Mr. Gross to Janus Funds?  Should an investor rush to find a new bond fund manager?

These questions are particularly important for fiduciaries of 401(k) and other qualified retirement programs that offer PIMCO Total Return Fund as an investment option.  Mr. Gross was the lead manager of the Total Return Fund, which reportedly is the second largest bond fund in existence and is a very common and popular choice for 401(k) and other defined contribution retirement plans.

In dealing with this highly visible issue, plan fiduciaries need to be mindful of the prudent person standard set forth in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).  The prudent person standard tells us that a plan fiduciary must act “with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims . . . .”  So what does this mean in the context of a fiduciary’s consideration of whether to retain or abandon the PIMCO Total Return Fund?

Plan fiduciaries may wish to gather and analyze as much information as they can with respect to the steps being taken by PIMCO to address Mr. Gross’s departure.  In the few days since Mr. Gross’s announcement, many articles have been written about PIMCO.  PIMCO also has held at least two conference calls to address Mr. Gross’s departure and its plans for the future.  The prudent fiduciary should review these materials to become fully informed concerning the current situation.  Perhaps depending on what the fiduciary learns by reviewing these materials, the prudent fiduciary also may want to consider other available alternatives.  Once this information is gathered and analyzed, the fiduciary should make an informed decision.

There is no right or wrong answer.  What is clear, though, is that a fiduciary who ignores the situation, or approaches it in a nonchalant manner, is failing to live up to the fiduciary standards imposed by ERISA.

By Mardy Gould May 24, 2024
Employee burnout has become an epidemic in today’s modern workplace. So much so that the World Health Organization (WHO) officially recognizes it as an “occupational phenomenon.”1 While many used to consider mounting workplace stress an individual employee problem, these days, it’s become an employer’s responsibility to prevent burnout before it hurts productivity and business performance—not to mention your employees’ physical and mental health. Luckily, you can prevent burnout from affecting your workforce in several ways. This article will explore the causes and signs of employee burnout and the steps you can take to create a positive work environment where employees feel safe from toxic stress levels.
By Mardy Gould May 23, 2024
If you're a small business owner, you may have heard of the acronym PCORI and the fees that come with it. But what is PCORI, and how does it apply to your organization? Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), sponsors of self-insured health plans must pay a fee to fund the federal Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). PCORI is an independent organization the ACA created to conduct research to help healthcare consumers make better decisions for their specific needs and outcomes. It also performs research related to clinical effectiveness. Employers offering a self-insured medical reimbursement health plan, such as a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA), must pay this fee by July 31 each year via Form 7201. This fee was initially set to expire in 2019, but Congress extended it through September 30, 20292, due to the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act of 20203.
More Posts